Outgoing White House adviser Sriram Krishnan says Trump administration won't establish centralized FDA-style AI regulator

Three cheers for @sriramk I guess, crazy work

FT: Trump will never support a US AI regulator, says outgoing adviser Sriram Krishnan.

The policy is selective pressure around cyber risk, not a broad licensing system.

Krishnan wants companies, chipmakers, security firms, and intelligence agencies to manage much of that pressure.

Americans need a visible share of AI’s gains, or resentment will keep growing.

“It is very concerning to me that we have these Chinese open-weight models that are good, and we don’t really have a leading American open-weight model yet,” - Sriram Krishnan.

--- ft .com/content/5128e476-db8b-48ac-a8fb-0f16d0f5c2ed?syn-25a6b1a6=1

you're welcome

@woke8yearold @RokoMijic yes that was me.

Never say never.

@woke8yearold @RokoMijic "Explain the part about the lizard that turns people into stone again..." "I know, but, I want to know more about the lizard. What's the deal with that?"

@teortaxesTex @sriramk Sriram was goated

@woke8yearold @RokoMijic still crazy we randomly reinvented pascals wager and consider it unique

@woke8yearold @RokoMijic More morons being one-shot by Roko's Ballsack

@FT Without US federal AI regulation the EU AI Act becomes the default global standard whether American firms like it or not.

@woke8yearold @RokoMijic

@FT Good All would-be "AI regulators" would do more damage to America than an actual nuclear bomb in terms of lives and money lost

@woke8yearold @RokoMijic Total rat victory

@FT no surprise there. regulators usually prioritize control over innovation.

@FT Great. We dont need a AI regulator. We need faster innovation and less regulation.

@FT He looks like frankestein.

@mindinpanic @FT lol AI will march ahead in the rest of the world with or without Europe, they will become irrelevant and rely on US tech and AI

@sriramk @woke8yearold @RokoMijic thank you for your service